Sony Xperia neo L vs. Samsung Galaxy S Advance 5.6 Winner Samsung Galaxy S Advance Reasons to buy the Samsung Galaxy S Advance Built in FM radio Listen to music from your favorite stations Vivid screen Super AMOLED Really small 63x123x9 mm Lots of internal storage 16 GB Average number of processor cores Dual core Better bluetooth support 3.0 Light-weight 120 g Long standby time 22.9 days Thin 10 mm 4.7 Runner-up Sony Xperia neo L Reasons to buy the Sony Xperia neo L Adobe Flash support Many games and videos on the Internet require Adobe Flash sharp screen 244 PPI

Compare Again

	vs	Compare
Xperia neo L vs Xperia J Xperia neo L vs Xperia U		Galaxy S Advance vs Galaxy S III mini Galaxy S Advance vs Galaxy S II

Overview

Music 4.0 vs 7.0 Winner: Samsung Galaxy S Advance [details] Listen to your music and news from your favorite radio stations wherever you are Sensors 7.8 vs 10.0 Winner: Samsung Galaxy S Advance [details] Storage 1.5 vs 3.3 Winner: Samsung Galaxy S Advance [details] 16x more internal storage, which means more music, photos and movies, 16 GB vs 1 GB Screen 5.9 vs 6.5 Winner: Samsung Galaxy S Advance [details] The Galaxy S Advance has a OLED screen, which are generally brighter and more vivid, Super AMOLED vs TFT LCD Size 7.2 vs 7.4 Too close to call [details] Photo & Video 6.2 vs 6.2 Too close to call [details] Both shoot high resolution HD movies Processing power 4.6 vs 4.8 Too close to call [details] Battery 4.5 vs 4.5 Too close to call [details] Keyboard & keypad 1.0 vs 1.0 Too close to call [details] Web browsing - vs - Missing information [details] Network - vs - Missing information [details] Both have wifi hotspots for wireless tethering Neither support NFC for wireless transactions Overall 4.7 vs 5.6

Music

	Sony Xperia neo L			Samsung Galaxy S Advance
	FM Radio	No	vs	Yes	With the Galaxy S Advance you can listen to music from your favorite radio stations
	FM Transmitter	No	vs	No	Neither have built-in FM transmitters
	Headphone jack	3.5 mm	vs	3.5 mm	Both have a headphone jack

Sensors

	Sony Xperia neo L			Samsung Galaxy S Advance
	GPS	Assisted GPS	vs	Assisted GPS	Have assisted GPS
	Accelerometer	Yes	vs	Yes	Both include an accelerometer
	Compass	Yes	vs	Yes	Both have integrated compasses
	Gyroscope	No	vs	Yes

Storage

	Sony Xperia neo L			Samsung Galaxy S Advance
	Memory card	Micro SD	vs	Micro SD	Both have memory card slots
	Internal storage	1 GB	vs	16 GB	The Galaxy S Advance has a lot of internal storage for storing music, photos and movies, but the neo L is below average

Screen

	Sony Xperia neo L			Samsung Galaxy S Advance
	Screen size	4.0"	vs	4.0"	Average sized screens
	Screen resolution	854x480	vs	800x480	Average screen resolution
	Screen PPI	244 PPI	vs	233 PPI	Average display of text, images and video
	Screen type	TFT LCD	vs	Super AMOLED	The Galaxy S Advance has an OLED screen which are generally very bright and vivid, the neo L doesn't
	Touchscreen type	Capacitive	vs	Capacitive	Touchscreen

Size

	Sony Xperia neo L			Samsung Galaxy S Advance
	Weight	131 g	vs	120 g	The Galaxy S Advance is quite light, but the neo L is heavier
	Thickness	12 mm	vs	10 mm	Average thickness
	Size	61x121x12 mm	vs	63x123x9 mm	The Galaxy S Advance is fairly small, but the neo L is not far behind
	Waterproof	No	vs	No	Neither are waterproof

Photo & Video

	Sony Xperia neo L			Samsung Galaxy S Advance
	Camera	5 MP	vs	5 MP	They both have cameras
	Flash	Yes	vs	Yes	Both have camera flashes
	Secondary Camera	0.3 MP	vs	1.3 MP
	Movie format	720p @ 30fps	vs	720p @ 30fps	Both shoot high resolution HD movies
	Video out	Unknown	vs	Unknown

Processing power

	Sony Xperia neo L			Samsung Galaxy S Advance
	Frequency	1.0 GHz	vs	1.0 GHz	Processors with average snapiness and responsiveness
	Number of cores	Single core	vs	Dual core	The Galaxy S Advance has 2 cores while the neo L has 1
	RAM	524 MB	vs	786 MB	Average amount of RAM for running apps

Battery

	Sony Xperia neo L			Samsung Galaxy S Advance
	Talk time	7.2 hours	vs	7.3 hours	Average talk time
	Standby time	17.1 days	vs	22.9 days	The Galaxy S Advance has good standby time, but the neo L is average
	Battery capacity	1,500 mAh	vs	1,500 mAh	Average capacity batteries
	Technology	Lithium Polymer	vs	Lithium Ion

Keyboard & keypad

	Sony Xperia neo L			Samsung Galaxy S Advance
	Numeric keypad	None	vs	None	Neither has a numeric keypad
	Keyboard	None	vs	None	Neither has a physical keyboard

Web browsing

	Sony Xperia neo L			Samsung Galaxy S Advance
	Browser benchmark	Unknown	vs	Unknown
	Adobe Flash support	Yes	vs	No	The neo L can access games and videos on the Internet that require Adobe Flash

Network

	Sony Xperia neo L			Samsung Galaxy S Advance
	Network	HSDPA (7.2 mbps)	vs	HSDPA (7.2 mbps)	Average data speeds
	Generation	3.5G	vs	3.5G	Standard network technology
	Download speed	Unknown	vs	Unknown
	Upload speed	Unknown	vs	Unknown
	Network latency	Unknown	vs	Unknown
	Wifi	802.11n (150 mbps)	vs	802.11n (150 mbps)	Average wifi speed
	Wifi hotspot	Yes	vs	Yes	Both have wifi hotspots for wireless tethering
	NFC	No	vs	No	Neither support NFC for wireless transactions
	Bluetooth	2.1	vs	3.0	The Galaxy S Advance has average bluetooth support, but the neo L's bluetooth support is somewhat older

Related Comparisons

Xperia neo L vs Xperia J Xperia neo L vs Xperia U Xperia neo L vs Xperia neo V Xperia neo L vs Lumia 720

Galaxy S Advance vs Galaxy S III mini Galaxy S Advance vs Galaxy S II Galaxy S Advance vs Galaxy S Duos Galaxy S Advance vs Galaxy Ace 2

Comments Which phone would you recommend, and why?