|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compare Again
Overview
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Size
|
|
||||||||||
 |
Weight | 147 g | vs | 144 g | The Xperia Ion isn't too heavy, but the Xperia acro S is quite heavy | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thickness | 12 mm | vs | 11 mm | Average thickness | ||||||
|
Size | 66x126x11 mm | vs | 68x133x10 mm | Large | ||||||
|
Waterproof | Yes | vs | No | The Xperia acro S is waterproof, great for shooting photos and video at the beach | ||||||
Network
|
|
||||||||||
|
Network | HSPA (14 mbps) | vs | LTE (80 mbps) | Average data speeds | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Generation | 3.5G | vs | 4G | The Xperia Ion has recent network technology, but the Xperia acro S's is average | ||||||
|
Download speed | 1.76 mbps | vs | 3.06 mbps | The Xperia Ion has average actual download speeds, but the Xperia acro S's is slow | ||||||
|
Upload speed | 0.72 mbps | vs | 1.38 mbps | The Xperia Ion has average actual upload speeds, but the Xperia acro S's is slow | ||||||
|
Network latency | 417 ms | vs | 145 ms | The Xperia Ion has average network latency, but the Xperia acro S's is worse than most | ||||||
|
Wifi | 802.11n (150 mbps) | vs | 802.11n (150 mbps) | Average wifi speed | ||||||
|
Wifi hotspot | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have wifi hotspots for wireless tethering | ||||||
|
NFC | Yes | vs | Yes | Both support NFC for wireless transactions | ||||||
|
Bluetooth | 3.0 | vs | 2.1 | The Xperia acro S has average bluetooth support, but the Xperia Ion's bluetooth support is somewhat older | ||||||
Battery
|
|
||||||||||
|
Talk time | 6.7 hours | vs | 7.5 hours | Average talk time | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Standby time | 12.1 days | vs | 16.3 days | Average standby time | ||||||
|
Battery capacity | 1,910 mAh | vs | 1,900 mAh | Average capacity batteries | ||||||
|
Technology | Unknown | vs | Lithium Ion | |||||||
Web browsing
|
|
||||||||||
|
Browser benchmark | 629 ms | vs | 573 ms | The Xperia Ion has a fairly fast web browser, but the Xperia acro S is average | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adobe Flash support | Yes | vs | Yes | Both support Adobe Flash | ||||||
Sensors
|
|
||||||||||
|
GPS | Assisted GPS | vs | Assisted GPS | Have assisted GPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Accelerometer | Yes | vs | Yes | Both include an accelerometer | ||||||
|
Compass | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have integrated compasses | ||||||
|
Gyroscope | Yes | vs | Yes | |||||||
Processing power
|
|
||||||||||
|
Frequency | 1.5 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | Powerful processors, very snappy and responsive | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of cores | Dual core | vs | Dual core | Both have dual core cpus which is about the average | ||||||
|
RAM | 1024 MB | vs | 1024 MB | Average amount of RAM for running apps | ||||||
Screen
|
|
||||||||||
|
Screen size | 4.3" | vs | 4.6" | The Xperia Ion has a large screen, but the Xperia acro S's is only average size | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Screen resolution | 1280x720 | vs | 720x1280 | High resolution screens | ||||||
|
Screen PPI | 341 PPI | vs | 322 PPI | Sharp display of text, images and video | ||||||
|
Screen type | TFT LCD | vs | TFT LCD | Both have LCD screens, fairly common | ||||||
|
Touchscreen type | Capacitive | vs | Capacitive | Touchscreen | ||||||
Music
|
|
||||||||||
|
FM Radio | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM Transmitter | No | vs | No | Neither have built-in FM transmitters | ||||||
|
Headphone jack | 3.5 mm | vs | 3.5 mm | Both have a headphone jack | ||||||
Photo & Video
|
|
||||||||||
|
Camera | 12.1 MP | vs | 12.1 MP | They both have cameras | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Flash | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have camera flashes | ||||||
|
Secondary Camera | 1.3 MP | vs | 1.3 MP | |||||||
|
Movie format | 1080p @ 30fps | vs | 1080p @ 30fps | Both shoot high resolution HD movies | ||||||
|
Video out | Micro HDMI | vs | Unknown | |||||||
Storage
|
|
||||||||||
|
Memory card | Micro SDHC, Micro SD | vs | Micro SDHC, Micro SD | Both have memory card slots | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Internal storage | 16 GB | vs | 16 GB | More internal storage than most for storing music, photos and movies | ||||||
Keyboard & keypad
|
|
||||||||||
|
Numeric keypad | None | vs | None | Neither has a numeric keypad | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Keyboard | None | vs | None | Neither has a physical keyboard | ||||||
Showing 0 comments