|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compare Again
Overview
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screen
|
|
||||||||||
 |
Screen size | 3.5" | vs | 3.2" | Very small screens | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Screen resolution | 854x480 | vs | 480x320 | The Xperia U's screen has average resolution, but the Live with Walkman's screen is very low resolution | ||||||
|
Screen PPI | 279 PPI | vs | 179 PPI | The Xperia U has a sharp screen, but the Live with Walkman is poor | ||||||
|
Screen type | TFT LCD | vs | TFT LCD | Both have LCD screens, fairly common | ||||||
|
Touchscreen type | Capacitive | vs | Capacitive | Touchscreen | ||||||
Storage
|
|
||||||||||
|
Memory card | None | vs | Micro SD, Micro SDHC | The Live with Walkman has a memory card slot which is great for increasing your phone's storage for photos, videos and music | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Internal storage | 4 GB | vs | 320 MB | The Xperia U's has an average amount of internal storage for storing music, photos and movies, but the Live with Walkman is below average | ||||||
Size
|
|
||||||||||
|
Weight | 110 g | vs | 115 g | Light weight | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thickness | 12 mm | vs | 14 mm | Average thickness | ||||||
|
Size | 54x112x12 mm | vs | 56x106x14 mm | The Xperia U is fairly small, but the Live with Walkman is not far behind | ||||||
|
Waterproof | No | vs | No | Neither are waterproof | ||||||
Music
|
|
||||||||||
|
FM Radio | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM Transmitter | No | vs | No | Neither have built-in FM transmitters | ||||||
|
Headphone jack | 3.5 mm | vs | 3.5 mm | Both have a headphone jack | ||||||
Photo & Video
|
|
||||||||||
|
Camera | 5 MP | vs | 5 MP | They both have cameras | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Flash | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have camera flashes | ||||||
|
Secondary Camera | 0.3 MP | vs | 0.3 MP | |||||||
|
Movie format | 720p @ 30fps | vs | 720p @ 30fps | Both shoot high resolution HD movies | ||||||
|
Video out | Micro USB | vs | None | The Xperia U has a Micro USB video output connector to display pictures or video on TVs or other devices | ||||||
Processing power
|
|
||||||||||
|
Frequency | 1.0 GHz | vs | 1.0 GHz | Processors with average snapiness and responsiveness | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of cores | Dual core | vs | Single core | The Xperia U has 2 cores while the Live with Walkman has 1 | ||||||
|
RAM | 524 MB | vs | 512 MB | Average amount of RAM for running apps | ||||||
Battery
|
|
||||||||||
|
Talk time | 5.6 hours | vs | 7.6 hours | The Live with Walkman has average talk time per battery charge, but the Xperia U's talk time is really poor | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Standby time | 19.7 days | vs | 25 days | The Live with Walkman has good standby time, but the Xperia U is average | ||||||
|
Battery capacity | 1,320 mAh | vs | 1,200 mAh | Lower capacity batteries | ||||||
|
Technology | Lithium Polymer | vs | Unknown | |||||||
Keyboard & keypad
|
|
||||||||||
|
Numeric keypad | None | vs | None | Neither has a numeric keypad | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Keyboard | None | vs | None | Neither has a physical keyboard | ||||||
Network
|
|
||||||||||
|
Network | HSDPA (7.2 mbps) | vs | HSDPA (7.2 mbps) | Average data speeds | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Generation | 3.5G | vs | 3.5G | Standard network technology | ||||||
|
Download speed | 2.59 mbps | vs | Unknown | |||||||
|
Upload speed | 1.13 mbps | vs | Unknown | |||||||
|
Network latency | 179 ms | vs | Unknown | |||||||
|
Wifi | 802.11n (150 mbps) | vs | 802.11n (150 mbps) | Average wifi speed | ||||||
|
Wifi hotspot | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have wifi hotspots for wireless tethering | ||||||
|
NFC | No | vs | No | Neither support NFC for wireless transactions | ||||||
|
Bluetooth | 2.1 | vs | 2.1 | Not the latest bluetooth support | ||||||
Sensors
|
|
||||||||||
|
GPS | Assisted GPS | vs | Assisted GPS | Have assisted GPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Accelerometer | Yes | vs | Yes | Both include an accelerometer | ||||||
|
Compass | Yes | vs | Unknown | |||||||
|
Gyroscope | No | vs | No | |||||||
Web browsing
|
|
||||||||||
|
Browser benchmark | 658 ms | vs | Unknown | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adobe Flash support | Yes | vs | Yes | Both support Adobe Flash | ||||||
Showing 0 comments