|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compare Again
Overview
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AppearanceClick and drag to rotate
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Storage
|
|
||||||||||
 |
Memory card | None | vs | Micro SD, Micro SDHC | The S II has a memory card slot which is great for increasing your phone's storage for photos, videos and music | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Internal storage | 32 GB | vs | 16 GB | The Xperia S has a lot of internal storage for storing music, photos and movies, with the S II being almost as good | ||||||
Processing power
|
|
||||||||||
|
Frequency | 1.5 GHz | vs | 1.2 GHz | The Xperia S has a powerful processor, but the S II is just average | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of cores | Dual core | vs | Dual core | Both have dual core cpus which is about the average | ||||||
|
RAM | 1024 MB | vs | 1024 MB | Average amount of RAM for running apps | ||||||
Battery
|
|
||||||||||
|
Talk time | 7.5 hours | vs | 8.6 hours | Average talk time | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Standby time | 18.8 days | vs | 7 days | The Xperia S has average standby time per battery charge, but the S II's talk time is really poor | ||||||
|
Battery capacity | 1,750 mAh | vs | 1,650 mAh | Average capacity batteries | ||||||
|
Technology | Lithium Ion | vs | Lithium Ion | |||||||
Size
|
|
||||||||||
|
Weight | 144 g | vs | 116 g | The S II is quite light, but the Xperia S is heavier | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thickness | 11 mm | vs | 8 mm | Average thickness | ||||||
|
Size | 64x128x10 mm | vs | 66x125x8 mm | The S II is fairly small, but the Xperia S is not far behind | ||||||
|
Waterproof | No | vs | No | Neither are waterproof | ||||||
Sensors
|
|
||||||||||
|
GPS | Assisted GPS | vs | Assisted GPS | Have assisted GPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Accelerometer | Yes | vs | Yes | Both include an accelerometer | ||||||
|
Compass | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have integrated compasses | ||||||
|
Gyroscope | Yes | vs | Yes | |||||||
Screen
|
|
||||||||||
|
Screen size | 4.3" | vs | 4.3" | Average sized screens | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Screen resolution | 1280x720 | vs | 800x480 | The Xperia S has a high resolution screen, but the S II's is only average size | ||||||
|
Screen PPI | 341 PPI | vs | 217 PPI | The Xperia S has a sharp screen, but the S II is average | ||||||
|
Screen type | TFT LCD | vs | Super AMOLED Plus | The S II has an OLED screen which are generally very bright and vivid, the Xperia S doesn't | ||||||
|
Touchscreen type | Capacitive | vs | Capacitive | Touchscreen | ||||||
Music
|
|
||||||||||
|
FM Radio | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM Transmitter | No | vs | No | Neither have built-in FM transmitters | ||||||
|
Headphone jack | 3.5 mm | vs | 3.5 mm | Both have a headphone jack | ||||||
Photo & Video
|
|
||||||||||
|
Camera | 12.1 MP | vs | 8 MP | They both have cameras | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Flash | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have camera flashes | ||||||
|
Secondary Camera | 1.3 MP | vs | 2 MP | |||||||
|
Movie format | 1080p @ 30fps | vs | 1080p @ 30fps | Both shoot high resolution HD movies | ||||||
|
Video out | Micro HDMI | vs | Micro USB | Both have video output to connect to TVs etc | ||||||
Keyboard & keypad
|
|
||||||||||
|
Numeric keypad | None | vs | None | Neither has a numeric keypad | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Keyboard | None | vs | None | Neither has a physical keyboard | ||||||
Network
|
|
||||||||||
|
Network | HSPA (14 mbps) | vs | HSDPA (21 mbps) | Average data speeds | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Generation | 3.5G | vs | 3.5G | Standard network technology | ||||||
|
Download speed | Unknown | vs | 4.63 mbps | |||||||
|
Upload speed | Unknown | vs | 1.41 mbps | |||||||
|
Network latency | Unknown | vs | 120 ms | |||||||
|
Wifi | 802.11n (150 mbps) | vs | 802.11n (150 mbps) | Average wifi speed | ||||||
|
Wifi hotspot | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have wifi hotspots for wireless tethering | ||||||
|
NFC | Yes | vs | Yes | Both support NFC for wireless transactions | ||||||
|
Bluetooth | 2.1 | vs | 3.0 | The S II has average bluetooth support, but the Xperia S's bluetooth support is somewhat older | ||||||
Web browsing
|
|
||||||||||
|
Browser benchmark | Unknown | vs | 535 ms | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adobe Flash support | Yes | vs | Yes | Both support Adobe Flash | ||||||
Showing 0 comments