|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compare Again
Overview
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Keyboard & keypad
|
|
||||||||||
 |
Numeric keypad | None | vs | Physical numeric keypad | The E52 has a numeric keypad, the Xperia S doesn't | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Keyboard | None | vs | None | Neither has a physical keyboard | ||||||
Screen
|
|
||||||||||
|
Screen size | 4.3" | vs | 2.4" | The Xperia S has an average sized screen, but the screen on the E52 is very small | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Screen resolution | 1280x720 | vs | 320x240 | The Xperia S has a high resolution screen, but the E52's is very low | ||||||
|
Screen PPI | 341 PPI | vs | 166 PPI | The Xperia S has a sharp screen, but the E52 is poor | ||||||
|
Screen type | TFT LCD | vs | TFT LCD | Both have LCD screens, fairly common | ||||||
|
Touchscreen type | Capacitive | vs | None | |||||||
Sensors
|
|
||||||||||
|
GPS | Assisted GPS | vs | GPS | The Xperia S has an assisted GPS, but the E52's GPS is not assisted | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Accelerometer | Yes | vs | Yes | Both include an accelerometer | ||||||
|
Compass | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have integrated compasses | ||||||
|
Gyroscope | Yes | vs | No | |||||||
Storage
|
|
||||||||||
|
Memory card | None | vs | Micro SDHC, Micro SD | The E52 has a memory card slot which is great for increasing your phone's storage for photos, videos and music | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Internal storage | 32 GB | vs | 60 MB | The Xperia S has a lot of internal storage for storing music, photos and movies, but the E52 is below average | ||||||
Photo & Video
|
|
||||||||||
|
Camera | 12.1 MP | vs | 3.2 MP | They both have cameras | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Flash | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have camera flashes | ||||||
|
Secondary Camera | 1.3 MP | vs | 0.1 MP | |||||||
|
Movie format | 1080p @ 30fps | vs | 480p @ 15fps | The Xperia S has good movie support, but the E52 does not | ||||||
|
Video out | Micro HDMI | vs | None | The Xperia S has a Micro HDMI video output connector to display pictures or video on TVs or other devices | ||||||
Size
|
|
||||||||||
|
Weight | 144 g | vs | 98 g | The E52 is very light, but the Xperia S is heavy | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thickness | 11 mm | vs | 10 mm | Average thickness | ||||||
|
Size | 64x128x10 mm | vs | 49x116x9 mm | The E52 is very small, while the Xperia S is only of average size | ||||||
|
Waterproof | No | vs | No | Neither are waterproof | ||||||
Music
|
|
||||||||||
|
FM Radio | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM Transmitter | No | vs | No | Neither have built-in FM transmitters | ||||||
|
Headphone jack | 3.5 mm | vs | 3.5 mm | Both have a headphone jack | ||||||
Battery
|
|
||||||||||
|
Talk time | 7.5 hours | vs | 8 hours | Average talk time | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Standby time | 18.8 days | vs | 28 days | The E52 has good standby time, but the Xperia S is average | ||||||
|
Battery capacity | 1,750 mAh | vs | 1,500 mAh | Average capacity batteries | ||||||
|
Technology | Lithium Ion | vs | Lithium Polymer | |||||||
Web browsing
|
|
||||||||||
|
Browser benchmark | Unknown | vs | Unknown | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adobe Flash support | Yes | vs | No | The Xperia S can access games and videos on the Internet that require Adobe Flash | ||||||
Network
|
|
||||||||||
|
Network | HSPA (14 mbps) | vs | HSDPA (7.2 mbps) | Average data speeds | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Generation | 3.5G | vs | 3.5G | Standard network technology | ||||||
|
Download speed | Unknown | vs | Unknown | |||||||
|
Upload speed | Unknown | vs | Unknown | |||||||
|
Network latency | Unknown | vs | Unknown | |||||||
|
Wifi | 802.11n (150 mbps) | vs | 802.11g (54 mbps) | The Xperia S's has average speed wifi, but the E52 is slower than most | ||||||
|
Wifi hotspot | Yes | vs | No | The Xperia S has a wifi hotspot to share it's Internet connection with other wifi devices | ||||||
|
NFC | Yes | vs | No | The Xperia S supports near field communication (NFC) which can be used for wireless payments and other transactions | ||||||
|
Bluetooth | 2.1 | vs | 2.0 | Not the latest bluetooth support | ||||||
Processing power
|
|
||||||||||
|
Frequency | 1.5 GHz | vs | 600 MHz | The Xperia S has a powerful processor, but the E52 is fairly slow | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of cores | Dual core | vs | Single core | The Xperia S has 2 cores while the E52 has 1 | ||||||
|
RAM | 1024 MB | vs | Unknown | |||||||
Related Comparisons
|
|
Showing 0 comments