|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compare Again
Overview
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Photo & Video
|
|
||||||||||
 |
Camera | 8 MP | vs | 5 MP | They both have cameras | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Flash | Yes | vs | No | The Xperia ray has a camera flash which helps avoid blurry photos when there isn't enough light | ||||||
|
Secondary Camera | 0.3 MP | vs | 0.3 MP | |||||||
|
Movie format | 720p @ 30fps | vs | 720p @ 30fps | Both shoot high resolution HD movies | ||||||
|
Video out | None | vs | Proprietary | The Galaxy S has a Proprietary video output connector to display pictures or video on TVs or other devices | ||||||
Sensors
|
|
||||||||||
|
GPS | Assisted GPS | vs | Assisted GPS | Have assisted GPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Accelerometer | Yes | vs | Yes | Both include an accelerometer | ||||||
|
Compass | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have integrated compasses | ||||||
|
Gyroscope | No | vs | Yes | |||||||
Storage
|
|
||||||||||
|
Memory card | Micro SD | vs | Micro SD, Micro SDHC | Both have memory card slots | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Internal storage | 300 MB | vs | 16 GB | The Galaxy S has a lot of internal storage for storing music, photos and movies, but the Xperia ray is below average | ||||||
Battery
|
|
||||||||||
|
Talk time | 6.5 hours | vs | 13.4 hours | The Galaxy S has good talk time, but the Xperia ray is average | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Standby time | 17.9 days | vs | 31.2 days | The Galaxy S has good standby time, but the Xperia ray is average | ||||||
|
Battery capacity | 1,500 mAh | vs | 1,500 mAh | Average capacity batteries | ||||||
|
Technology | Lithium Ion | vs | Lithium Ion | |||||||
Network
|
|
||||||||||
|
Network | HSDPA (7.2 mbps) | vs | HSDPA (7.2 mbps) | Average data speeds | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Generation | 3.5G | vs | 3.5G | Standard network technology | ||||||
|
Download speed | 2.46 mbps | vs | 2.13 mbps | Somewhat slow actual download speeds | ||||||
|
Upload speed | 0.39 mbps | vs | 0.95 mbps | The Galaxy S has average actual upload speeds, but the Xperia ray's is slow | ||||||
|
Network latency | 278 ms | vs | 171 ms | The Galaxy S has average network latency, but the Xperia ray's is worse than most | ||||||
|
Wifi | 802.11n (150 mbps) | vs | 802.11n (150 mbps) | Average wifi speed | ||||||
|
Wifi hotspot | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have wifi hotspots for wireless tethering | ||||||
|
NFC | No | vs | No | Neither support NFC for wireless transactions | ||||||
|
Bluetooth | 2.1 | vs | 3.0 | The Galaxy S has average bluetooth support, but the Xperia ray's bluetooth support is somewhat older | ||||||
Screen
|
|
||||||||||
|
Screen size | 3.3" | vs | 4.0" | The Galaxy S has an average sized screen, but the screen on the Xperia ray is very small | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Screen resolution | 854x480 | vs | 800x480 | Average screen resolution | ||||||
|
Screen PPI | 295 PPI | vs | 232 PPI | The Xperia ray has a sharp screen, but the Galaxy S is average | ||||||
|
Screen type | TFT LCD | vs | Super AMOLED | The Galaxy S has an OLED screen which are generally very bright and vivid, the Xperia ray doesn't | ||||||
|
Touchscreen type | Capacitive | vs | Capacitive | Touchscreen | ||||||
Web browsing
|
|
||||||||||
|
Browser benchmark | 878 ms | vs | 1,072 ms | Average speed web browsers | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adobe Flash support | Yes | vs | Yes | Both support Adobe Flash | ||||||
Size
|
|
||||||||||
|
Weight | 100 g | vs | 118 g | Light weight, with the Xperia ray being particularly light | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thickness | 9 mm | vs | 10 mm | Average thickness | ||||||
|
Size | 53x111x9 mm | vs | 64x122x9 mm | Both the Xperia ray and Galaxy S are quite small | ||||||
|
Waterproof | No | vs | No | Neither are waterproof | ||||||
Music
|
|
||||||||||
|
FM Radio | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM Transmitter | No | vs | No | Neither have built-in FM transmitters | ||||||
|
Headphone jack | 3.5 mm | vs | 3.5 mm | Both have a headphone jack | ||||||
Processing power
|
|
||||||||||
|
Frequency | 1.0 GHz | vs | 1.0 GHz | Processors with average snapiness and responsiveness | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of cores | Single core | vs | Single core | Both have less multitasking capability due to having only 1 core | ||||||
|
RAM | 512 MB | vs | 512 MB | Average amount of RAM for running apps | ||||||
Keyboard & keypad
|
|
||||||||||
|
Numeric keypad | None | vs | None | Neither has a numeric keypad | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Keyboard | None | vs | None | Neither has a physical keyboard | ||||||
Related Comparisons
|
|
Showing 0 comments