|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compare Again
Overview
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Size
|
|
||||||||||
 |
Weight | 126 g | vs | 100 g | The Xperia ray is very light, while the Xperia neo V is heavier, but not bad | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thickness | 13 mm | vs | 9 mm | Average thickness | ||||||
|
Size | 57x116x13 mm | vs | 53x111x9 mm | The Xperia ray is very small, while the Xperia neo V is only of average size | ||||||
|
Waterproof | No | vs | No | Neither are waterproof | ||||||
Sensors
|
|
||||||||||
|
GPS | Assisted GPS | vs | Assisted GPS | Have assisted GPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Accelerometer | Yes | vs | Yes | Both include an accelerometer | ||||||
|
Compass | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have integrated compasses | ||||||
|
Gyroscope | No | vs | No | |||||||
Music
|
|
||||||||||
|
FM Radio | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM Transmitter | No | vs | No | Neither have built-in FM transmitters | ||||||
|
Headphone jack | 3.5 mm | vs | 3.5 mm | Both have a headphone jack | ||||||
Photo & Video
|
|
||||||||||
|
Camera | 5 MP | vs | 8 MP | They both have cameras | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Flash | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have camera flashes | ||||||
|
Secondary Camera | 0.3 MP | vs | 0.3 MP | |||||||
|
Movie format | 720p @ 30fps | vs | 720p @ 30fps | Both shoot high resolution HD movies | ||||||
|
Video out | Micro HDMI | vs | None | The Xperia neo V has a Micro HDMI video output connector to display pictures or video on TVs or other devices | ||||||
Screen
|
|
||||||||||
|
Screen size | 3.7" | vs | 3.3" | Very small screens | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Screen resolution | 854x480 | vs | 854x480 | Average screen resolution | ||||||
|
Screen PPI | 263 PPI | vs | 295 PPI | The Xperia ray has a sharp screen, but the Xperia neo V is average | ||||||
|
Screen type | TFT LCD | vs | TFT LCD | Both have LCD screens, fairly common | ||||||
|
Touchscreen type | Capacitive | vs | Capacitive | Touchscreen | ||||||
Processing power
|
|
||||||||||
|
Frequency | 1.0 GHz | vs | 1.0 GHz | Processors with average snapiness and responsiveness | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of cores | Single core | vs | Single core | Both have less multitasking capability due to having only 1 core | ||||||
|
RAM | 524 MB | vs | 512 MB | Average amount of RAM for running apps | ||||||
Battery
|
|
||||||||||
|
Talk time | 6.9 hours | vs | 6.5 hours | Average talk time | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Standby time | 17.9 days | vs | 17.9 days | Average standby time | ||||||
|
Battery capacity | 1,500 mAh | vs | 1,500 mAh | Average capacity batteries | ||||||
|
Technology | Lithium Polymer | vs | Lithium Ion | |||||||
Storage
|
|
||||||||||
|
Memory card | Micro SD, Micro SDHC | vs | Micro SD | Both have memory card slots | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Internal storage | 320 MB | vs | 300 MB | Less internal storage than average for storing music, photos and movies | ||||||
Keyboard & keypad
|
|
||||||||||
|
Numeric keypad | None | vs | None | Neither has a numeric keypad | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Keyboard | None | vs | None | Neither has a physical keyboard | ||||||
Network
|
|
||||||||||
|
Network | HSDPA (7.2 mbps) | vs | HSDPA (7.2 mbps) | Average data speeds | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Generation | 3.5G | vs | 3.5G | Standard network technology | ||||||
|
Download speed | Unknown | vs | 2.75 mbps | |||||||
|
Upload speed | Unknown | vs | 0.42 mbps | |||||||
|
Network latency | Unknown | vs | 211 ms | |||||||
|
Wifi | 802.11n (150 mbps) | vs | 802.11n (150 mbps) | Average wifi speed | ||||||
|
Wifi hotspot | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have wifi hotspots for wireless tethering | ||||||
|
NFC | No | vs | No | Neither support NFC for wireless transactions | ||||||
|
Bluetooth | 2.1 | vs | 2.1 | Not the latest bluetooth support | ||||||
Web browsing
|
|
||||||||||
|
Browser benchmark | Unknown | vs | 844 ms | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adobe Flash support | Yes | vs | Yes | Both support Adobe Flash | ||||||
Showing 0 comments