Sony
Xperia neo V
vs. Samsung
Galaxy S

Updated (August, 2011): Compare the Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V vs Samsung Galaxy S II

Samsung Galaxy S

5.2

Tie Android

Samsung Galaxy S

"With push email turned on and regular use, we got through two days from the Galaxy S’ 1,500mAh battery, surprising indeed for a modern touchscreen smartphone."
slashgear.com | talking about the Galaxy S's battery
"Nonetheless, it’s one of the best panels we’ve seen on a mobile device of late."
slashgear.com | talking about the Galaxy S's screen

Reasons to buy the Samsung Galaxy S

Screen type
Vivid screen
Super AMOLED
Talk time
Long talk time
13.4 hours
Internal storage
Lots of internal storage
16 GB
Standby time
Long standby time
31.2 days
Bluetooth
Better bluetooth support
3.0
Size
Really small
64x122x9 mm
Screen size
Average sized screen
4.0"
Weight
Light-weight
118 g
Thickness
Thin
10 mm
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V

5.0

Tie Android

Sony Xperia neo V

Reasons to buy the Sony Xperia neo V

Flash
Has a camera flash
Avoid blurry pictures when there isn't enough light
Screen PPI
sharp screen
263 PPI

Compare Again

vs Compare
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V Sony Ericsson Xperia neo Xperia neo V vs Xperia neo
Placeholder Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V Xperia neo V vs Xperia neo L
Samsung Galaxy S Plus Samsung Galaxy S Galaxy S vs Galaxy S Plus
Samsung GALAXY W Samsung Galaxy S Galaxy S vs Galaxy W

Overview

Photo & Video 6.2 vs 1.7
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V Winner: Sony Xperia neo V
[details]
  • Features a camera flash for taking photos with less light
Sensors 7.8 vs 10.0
Samsung Galaxy S Winner: Samsung Galaxy S
[details]
Storage 1.5 vs 3.3
Samsung Galaxy S Winner: Samsung Galaxy S
[details]
  • More than 51x more internal storage, which means more music, photos and movies, 16 GB vs 320 MB
Battery 4.5 vs 5.6
Samsung Galaxy S Winner: Samsung Galaxy S
[details]
  • More than 90% more talk time per battery charge, 13.4 hours vs 6.9 hours
  • More than 70% more standby time, less frequent charging, 31.2 days vs 17.9 days
Screen 5.8 vs 6.5
Samsung Galaxy S Winner: Samsung Galaxy S
[details]
  • The Galaxy S has a OLED screen, which are generally brighter and more vivid, Super AMOLED vs TFT LCD
  • More than 20% larger screen, 4.0" vs 3.7"
Size 7.3 vs 7.4
Too close to call
[details]
Music 7.0 vs 7.0
Too close to call
[details]
  • Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations
Processing power 4.6 vs 4.6
Too close to call
[details]
  • Both have less multitasking capability due to having only 1 core
Keyboard & keypad 1.0 vs 1.0
Too close to call
[details]
Network - vs 6.1
Missing information
[details]
  • Both have wifi hotspots for wireless tethering
  • Neither support NFC for wireless transactions
Web browsing - vs 9.3
Missing information
[details]
  • Both support Adobe Flash
Overall 5.0 vs 5.2

Photo & Video

Sony
Xperia neo V
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
Samsung Galaxy S Samsung
Galaxy S
Help
Camera 5 MP vs 5 MP They both have cameras
Help
Flash Yes vs No The Xperia neo V has a camera flash which helps avoid blurry photos when there isn't enough light
Help
Secondary Camera 0.3 MP vs 0.3 MP
Help
Movie format 720p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps Both shoot high resolution HD movies
Help
Video out Micro HDMI vs Proprietary Both have video output to connect to TVs etc

Sensors

Sony
Xperia neo V
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
Samsung Galaxy S Samsung
Galaxy S
Help
GPS Assisted GPS vs Assisted GPS Have assisted GPS
Help
Accelerometer Yes vs Yes Both include an accelerometer
Help
Compass Yes vs Yes Both have integrated compasses
Help
Gyroscope No vs Yes

Storage

Sony
Xperia neo V
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
Samsung Galaxy S Samsung
Galaxy S
Help
Memory card Micro SDHC, Micro SD vs Micro SDHC, Micro SD Both have memory card slots
Help
Internal storage 320 MB vs 16 GB The Galaxy S has a lot of internal storage for storing music, photos and movies, but the Xperia neo V is below average

Battery

Sony
Xperia neo V
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
Samsung Galaxy S Samsung
Galaxy S
Help
Talk time 6.9 hours vs 13.4 hours The Galaxy S has good talk time, but the Xperia neo V is average
Help
Standby time 17.9 days vs 31.2 days The Galaxy S has good standby time, but the Xperia neo V is average
Help
Battery capacity 1,500 mAh vs 1,500 mAh Average capacity batteries
Help
Technology Lithium Polymer vs Lithium Ion

Screen

Sony
Xperia neo V
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
Samsung Galaxy S Samsung
Galaxy S
Help
Screen size 3.7" vs 4.0" The Galaxy S has an average sized screen, but the screen on the Xperia neo V is very small
Help
Screen resolution 854x480 vs 800x480 Average screen resolution
Help
Screen PPI 263 PPI vs 232 PPI Average display of text, images and video
Help
Screen type TFT LCD vs Super AMOLED The Galaxy S has an OLED screen which are generally very bright and vivid, the Xperia neo V doesn't
Help
Touchscreen type Capacitive vs Capacitive Touchscreen

Size

Sony
Xperia neo V
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
Samsung Galaxy S Samsung
Galaxy S
Help
Weight 126 g vs 118 g The Galaxy S is quite light, but the Xperia neo V is heavier
Help
Thickness 13 mm vs 10 mm Average thickness
Help
Size 57x116x13 mm vs 64x122x9 mm The Galaxy S is fairly small, but the Xperia neo V is not far behind
Help
Waterproof No vs No Neither are waterproof

Music

Sony
Xperia neo V
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
Samsung Galaxy S Samsung
Galaxy S
Help
FM Radio Yes vs Yes Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations
Help
FM Transmitter No vs No Neither have built-in FM transmitters
Help
Headphone jack 3.5 mm vs 3.5 mm Both have a headphone jack

Processing power

Sony
Xperia neo V
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
Samsung Galaxy S Samsung
Galaxy S
Help
Frequency 1.0 GHz vs 1.0 GHz Processors with average snapiness and responsiveness
Help
Number of cores Single core vs Single core Both have less multitasking capability due to having only 1 core
Help
RAM 524 MB vs 512 MB Average amount of RAM for running apps

Keyboard & keypad

Sony
Xperia neo V
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
Samsung Galaxy S Samsung
Galaxy S
Help
Numeric keypad None vs None Neither has a numeric keypad
Help
Keyboard None vs None Neither has a physical keyboard

Network

Sony
Xperia neo V
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
Samsung Galaxy S Samsung
Galaxy S
Help
Network HSDPA (7.2 mbps) vs HSDPA (7.2 mbps) Average data speeds
Help
Generation 3.5G vs 3.5G Standard network technology
Help
Download speed Unknown vs 2.51 mbps
Help
Upload speed Unknown vs 0.94 mbps
Help
Network latency Unknown vs 168 ms
Help
Wifi 802.11n (150 mbps) vs 802.11n (150 mbps) Average wifi speed
Help
Wifi hotspot Yes vs Yes Both have wifi hotspots for wireless tethering
Help
NFC No vs No Neither support NFC for wireless transactions
Help
Bluetooth 2.1 vs 3.0 The Galaxy S has average bluetooth support, but the Xperia neo V's bluetooth support is somewhat older

Web browsing

Sony
Xperia neo V
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
Samsung Galaxy S Samsung
Galaxy S
Help
Browser benchmark Unknown vs 1,049 ms
Help
Adobe Flash support Yes vs Yes Both support Adobe Flash

Related Comparisons

Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V Sony Ericsson Xperia neo Xperia neo V vs Xperia neo
Placeholder Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V Xperia neo V vs Xperia neo L
Sony Xperia U Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V Xperia neo V vs Xperia U
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V Sony Ericsson Xperia arc S Xperia neo V vs Xperia Arc S
Samsung Galaxy S Plus Samsung Galaxy S Galaxy S vs Galaxy S Plus
Samsung GALAXY W Samsung Galaxy S Galaxy S vs Galaxy W
Sony Xperia Sola Samsung Galaxy S Galaxy S vs Xperia Sola
Samsung Galaxy S II Samsung Galaxy S Galaxy S vs Galaxy S II

Comments Which phone would you recommend, and why?

Showing 0 comments