|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compare Again
Overview
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Storage
|
|
||||||||||
 |
Memory card | Micro SD | vs | Micro SD, Micro SDHC | Both have memory card slots | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Internal storage | 4 GB | vs | 16 GB | The S II has a lot of internal storage for storing music, photos and movies, but the Blaze 4G is average | ||||||
Processing power
|
|
||||||||||
|
Frequency | 1.5 GHz | vs | 1.2 GHz | The Blaze 4G has a powerful processor, but the S II is just average | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of cores | Dual core | vs | Dual core | Both have dual core cpus which is about the average | ||||||
|
RAM | 1024 MB | vs | 1024 MB | Average amount of RAM for running apps | ||||||
Photo & Video
|
|
||||||||||
|
Camera | 5 MP | vs | 8 MP | They both have cameras | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Flash | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have camera flashes | ||||||
|
Secondary Camera | 1.3 MP | vs | 2 MP | |||||||
|
Movie format | 720p | vs | 1080p @ 30fps | The S II has good movie support, but the Blaze 4G does not | ||||||
|
Video out | Unknown | vs | Micro USB | |||||||
Screen
|
|
||||||||||
|
Screen size | 4.0" | vs | 4.3" | Average sized screens | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Screen resolution | 800x480 | vs | 800x480 | Average screen resolution | ||||||
|
Screen PPI | 235 PPI | vs | 217 PPI | Average display of text, images and video | ||||||
|
Screen type | Super AMOLED | vs | Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED screens are generally bright and vivid | ||||||
|
Touchscreen type | Capacitive | vs | Capacitive | Touchscreen | ||||||
Network
|
|
||||||||||
|
Network | HSPA+ (84 mbps) | vs | HSDPA (21 mbps) | Very fast data transfer, but the S II's is rather average | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Generation | 3.5G | vs | 3.5G | Standard network technology | ||||||
|
Download speed | 5.94 mbps | vs | 4.83 mbps | The Blaze 4G has fast actual download speeds, but the S II is average | ||||||
|
Upload speed | 1.15 mbps | vs | 1.48 mbps | Average actual upload speeds | ||||||
|
Network latency | 93 ms | vs | 119 ms | Both have better than average network latency | ||||||
|
Wifi | 802.11n (150 mbps) | vs | 802.11n (150 mbps) | Average wifi speed | ||||||
|
Wifi hotspot | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have wifi hotspots for wireless tethering | ||||||
|
NFC | Yes | vs | Yes | Both support NFC for wireless transactions | ||||||
|
Bluetooth | 3.0 | vs | 3.0 | Average bluetooth support | ||||||
Web browsing
|
|
||||||||||
|
Browser benchmark | 701 ms | vs | 523 ms | The S II has a fairly fast web browser, but the Blaze 4G is average | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adobe Flash support | Yes | vs | Yes | Both support Adobe Flash | ||||||
Sensors
|
|
||||||||||
|
GPS | Assisted GPS | vs | Assisted GPS | Have assisted GPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Accelerometer | Yes | vs | Yes | Both include an accelerometer | ||||||
|
Compass | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have integrated compasses | ||||||
|
Gyroscope | Yes | vs | Yes | |||||||
Size
|
|
||||||||||
|
Weight | 128 g | vs | 116 g | The S II is quite light, but the Blaze 4G is heavier | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thickness | 11 mm | vs | 8 mm | Average thickness | ||||||
|
Size | 63x122x11 mm | vs | 66x125x8 mm | The S II is fairly small, but the Blaze 4G is not far behind | ||||||
|
Waterproof | No | vs | No | Neither are waterproof | ||||||
Music
|
|
||||||||||
|
FM Radio | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM Transmitter | No | vs | No | Neither have built-in FM transmitters | ||||||
|
Headphone jack | 3.5 mm | vs | 3.5 mm | Both have a headphone jack | ||||||
Battery
|
|
||||||||||
|
Talk time | 7 hours | vs | 8.6 hours | Average talk time | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Standby time | 9.6 days | vs | 7 days | Short standby time | ||||||
|
Battery capacity | 1,750 mAh | vs | 1,650 mAh | Average capacity batteries | ||||||
|
Technology | Lithium Ion | vs | Lithium Ion | |||||||
Keyboard & keypad
|
|
||||||||||
|
Numeric keypad | None | vs | None | Neither has a numeric keypad | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Keyboard | None | vs | None | Neither has a physical keyboard | ||||||
Showing 0 comments