|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compare Again
Overview
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screen
|
|
||||||||||
 |
Screen size | 4.3" | vs | 4.5" | The Galaxy S II Skyrocket has a large screen, but the Lumia 900's is only average size | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Screen resolution | 800x480 | vs | 800x480 | Average screen resolution | ||||||
|
Screen PPI | 216 PPI | vs | 206 PPI | Average display of text, images and video | ||||||
|
Screen type | AMOLED | vs | Super AMOLED Plus | The Galaxy S II Skyrocket has a Super AMOLED Plus screen which is even more vivid, the Lumia 900 doesn't | ||||||
|
Touchscreen type | Capacitive | vs | Capacitive | Touchscreen | ||||||
Processing power
|
|
||||||||||
|
Frequency | 1.4 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | Powerful processors, very snappy and responsive | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of cores | Single core | vs | Dual core | The Galaxy S II Skyrocket has 2 cores while the Lumia 900 has 1 | ||||||
|
RAM | 512 MB | vs | 1024 MB | Average amount of RAM for running apps | ||||||
Photo & Video
|
|
||||||||||
|
Camera | 8 MP | vs | 8 MP | They both have cameras | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Flash | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have camera flashes | ||||||
|
Secondary Camera | 1 MP | vs | 2 MP | |||||||
|
Movie format | 720p @ 30fps | vs | 1080p @ 30fps | Good movie support | ||||||
|
Video out | None | vs | Micro USB | The Galaxy S II Skyrocket has a Micro USB video output connector to display pictures or video on TVs or other devices | ||||||
Size
|
|
||||||||||
|
Weight | 160 g | vs | 130 g | The Galaxy S II Skyrocket isn't too heavy, but the Lumia 900 is quite heavy | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thickness | 12 mm | vs | 9 mm | Average thickness | ||||||
|
Size | 127x68x11 mm | vs | 68x129x9 mm | The Galaxy S II Skyrocket is of average size, but the Lumia 900 is large | ||||||
|
Waterproof | No | vs | No | Neither are waterproof | ||||||
Sensors
|
|
||||||||||
|
GPS | Assisted GPS | vs | Assisted GPS | Have assisted GPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Accelerometer | Yes | vs | Yes | Both include an accelerometer | ||||||
|
Compass | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have integrated compasses | ||||||
|
Gyroscope | Yes | vs | Yes | |||||||
Music
|
|
||||||||||
|
FM Radio | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM Transmitter | No | vs | No | Neither have built-in FM transmitters | ||||||
|
Headphone jack | 3.5 mm | vs | 3.5 mm | Both have a headphone jack | ||||||
Battery
|
|
||||||||||
|
Talk time | 7 hours | vs | 7 hours | Average talk time | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Standby time | 12.5 days | vs | 10.4 days | Average standby time | ||||||
|
Battery capacity | 1,830 mAh | vs | 1,850 mAh | Average capacity batteries | ||||||
|
Technology | Lithium Ion | vs | Lithium Ion | |||||||
Storage
|
|
||||||||||
|
Memory card | None | vs | Micro SD, Micro SDHC | The Galaxy S II Skyrocket has a memory card slot which is great for increasing your phone's storage for photos, videos and music | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Internal storage | 16 GB | vs | 16 GB | Average amount of internal storage for storing music, photos and movies | ||||||
Keyboard & keypad
|
|
||||||||||
|
Numeric keypad | None | vs | None | Neither has a numeric keypad | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Keyboard | None | vs | None | Neither has a physical keyboard | ||||||
Network
|
|
||||||||||
|
Network | LTE (50 mbps) | vs | LTE (80 mbps) | The Lumia 900 has fast data transfer, but the Galaxy S II Skyrocket is just average | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Generation | 4G | vs | 4G | Both have recent network technology for fast data transfer | ||||||
|
Download speed | Unknown | vs | 4.59 mbps | |||||||
|
Upload speed | Unknown | vs | 1.41 mbps | |||||||
|
Network latency | Unknown | vs | 115 ms | |||||||
|
Wifi | 802.11n (150 mbps) | vs | 802.11n (150 mbps) | Average wifi speed | ||||||
|
Wifi hotspot | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have wifi hotspots for wireless tethering | ||||||
|
NFC | No | vs | Yes | The Galaxy S II Skyrocket supports near field communication (NFC) which can be used for wireless payments and other transactions | ||||||
|
Bluetooth | 2.1 | vs | 3.0 | The Galaxy S II Skyrocket has average bluetooth support, but the Lumia 900's bluetooth support is somewhat older | ||||||
Web browsing
|
|
||||||||||
|
Browser benchmark | Unknown | vs | 706 ms | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adobe Flash support | No | vs | Yes | The Galaxy S II Skyrocket can access games and videos on the Internet that require Adobe Flash | ||||||
Showing 0 comments