|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compare Again
Overview
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Keyboard & keypad
|
|
||||||||||
 |
Numeric keypad | Physical numeric keypad | vs | Physical numeric keypad | Both have numeric keypads | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Keyboard | QWERTY keyboard | vs | None | The Asha 303 has a full keyboard, the E52 doesn't have a keyboard at all | ||||||
Sensors
|
|
||||||||||
|
GPS | GPS | vs | GPS | Lack assisted GPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Accelerometer | No | vs | Yes | The E52's accelerometer enables apps to detect when you're moving your phone for motion interactivity | ||||||
|
Compass | No | vs | Yes | The E52 has a compass to know which direction you're facing all the time, even if you're not moving | ||||||
|
Gyroscope | No | vs | No | |||||||
Music
|
|
||||||||||
|
FM Radio | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM Transmitter | Yes | vs | No | The Asha 303 can play music through your car stereo using FM radio, the E52 would need cables or an FM adapter | ||||||
|
Headphone jack | 3.5 mm | vs | 3.5 mm | Both have a headphone jack | ||||||
Screen
|
|
||||||||||
|
Screen size | 2.6" | vs | 2.4" | Very small screens | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Screen resolution | 240x320 | vs | 320x240 | Low resolution screens | ||||||
|
Screen PPI | 153 PPI | vs | 166 PPI | Lower quality display of text, images and video | ||||||
|
Screen type | TFT LCD | vs | TFT LCD | Both have LCD screens, fairly common | ||||||
|
Touchscreen type | Capacitive | vs | None | |||||||
Size
|
|
||||||||||
|
Weight | 99 g | vs | 98 g | Light weight, with the E52 being particularly light | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thickness | 14 mm | vs | 10 mm | Average thickness | ||||||
|
Size | 116x55x13 mm | vs | 49x116x9 mm | The E52 is very small, while the Asha 303 is only of average size | ||||||
|
Waterproof | No | vs | No | Neither are waterproof | ||||||
Battery
|
|
||||||||||
|
Talk time | 7.2 hours | vs | 8 hours | Average talk time | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Standby time | 35 days | vs | 28 days | Long standby time | ||||||
|
Battery capacity | 1,300 mAh | vs | 1,500 mAh | The E52 has average battery capacity, but the Asha 303's is really low | ||||||
|
Technology | Lithium Ion | vs | Lithium Polymer | |||||||
Storage
|
|
||||||||||
|
Memory card | Micro SD | vs | Micro SDHC, Micro SD | Both have memory card slots | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Internal storage | 174 MB | vs | 60 MB | Less internal storage than average for storing music, photos and movies | ||||||
Processing power
|
|
||||||||||
|
Frequency | 1.0 GHz | vs | 600 MHz | The Asha 303's has an average speed processor, but the E52 is slower than most | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of cores | Unknown | vs | Single core | |||||||
|
RAM | 131 MB | vs | Unknown | |||||||
Web browsing
|
|
||||||||||
|
Browser benchmark | Unknown | vs | Unknown | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adobe Flash support | No | vs | No | Neither supports Adobe Flash | ||||||
Network
|
|
||||||||||
|
Network | HSDPA (7.2 mbps) | vs | HSDPA (7.2 mbps) | Average data speeds | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Generation | 3.5G | vs | 3.5G | Standard network technology | ||||||
|
Download speed | Unknown | vs | Unknown | |||||||
|
Upload speed | Unknown | vs | Unknown | |||||||
|
Network latency | Unknown | vs | Unknown | |||||||
|
Wifi | 802.11n (150 mbps) | vs | 802.11g (54 mbps) | The Asha 303's has average speed wifi, but the E52 is slower than most | ||||||
|
Wifi hotspot | No | vs | No | Neither have wifi hotspots for wireless tethering | ||||||
|
NFC | No | vs | No | Neither support NFC for wireless transactions | ||||||
|
Bluetooth | 2.1 | vs | 2.0 | Not the latest bluetooth support | ||||||
Photo & Video
|
|
||||||||||
|
Camera | 3.2 MP | vs | 3.2 MP | They both have cameras | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Flash | Unknown | vs | Yes | |||||||
|
Secondary Camera | None | vs | 0.1 MP | |||||||
|
Movie format | Unknown | vs | 480p @ 15fps | |||||||
|
Video out | Unknown | vs | None | |||||||
Related Comparisons
|
|
Showing 0 comments