|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compare Again
Overview
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AppearanceClick and drag to rotate
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Music
|
|
||||||||||
 |
FM Radio | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM Transmitter | Yes | vs | No | The 808 PureView can play music through your car stereo using FM radio, the S II would need cables or an FM adapter | ||||||
|
Headphone jack | 3.5 mm | vs | 3.5 mm | Both have a headphone jack | ||||||
Screen
|
|
||||||||||
|
Screen size | 4.0" | vs | 4.3" | Average sized screens | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Screen resolution | 360x640 | vs | 800x480 | The S II's screen has average resolution, but the 808 PureView's screen is very low resolution | ||||||
|
Screen PPI | 183 PPI | vs | 217 PPI | The S II's screen is somewhat sharp, but the 808 PureView's is poor likely resulting in pixelation | ||||||
|
Screen type | AMOLED | vs | Super AMOLED Plus | The S II has a Super AMOLED Plus screen which is even more vivid, the 808 PureView doesn't | ||||||
|
Touchscreen type | Capacitive | vs | Capacitive | Touchscreen | ||||||
Size
|
|
||||||||||
|
Weight | 169 g | vs | 116 g | The S II is quite light, but the 808 PureView is heavy | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thickness | 14 mm | vs | 8 mm | Average thickness | ||||||
|
Size | 60x123x13 mm | vs | 66x125x8 mm | The S II is fairly small, but the 808 PureView is large | ||||||
|
Waterproof | No | vs | No | Neither are waterproof | ||||||
Sensors
|
|
||||||||||
|
GPS | Assisted GPS | vs | Assisted GPS | Have assisted GPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Accelerometer | Yes | vs | Yes | Both include an accelerometer | ||||||
|
Compass | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have integrated compasses | ||||||
|
Gyroscope | Yes | vs | Yes | |||||||
Photo & Video
|
|
||||||||||
|
Camera | 41 MP | vs | 8 MP | They both have cameras | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Flash | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have camera flashes | ||||||
|
Secondary Camera | 0.3 MP | vs | 2 MP | |||||||
|
Movie format | 1080p @ 30fps | vs | 1080p @ 30fps | Both shoot high resolution HD movies | ||||||
|
Video out | Micro HDMI | vs | Micro USB | Both have video output to connect to TVs etc | ||||||
Processing power
|
|
||||||||||
|
Frequency | 1.3 GHz | vs | 1.2 GHz | Processors with average snapiness and responsiveness | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of cores | Single core | vs | Dual core | The S II has 2 cores while the 808 PureView has 1 | ||||||
|
RAM | 524 MB | vs | 1024 MB | Average amount of RAM for running apps | ||||||
Battery
|
|
||||||||||
|
Talk time | 6.5 hours | vs | 8.6 hours | Average talk time | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Standby time | 22.5 days | vs | 7 days | The 808 PureView has average standby time per battery charge, but the S II's talk time is really poor | ||||||
|
Battery capacity | 1,400 mAh | vs | 1,650 mAh | The S II has average battery capacity, but the 808 PureView's is really low | ||||||
|
Technology | Lithium Ion | vs | Lithium Ion | |||||||
Storage
|
|
||||||||||
|
Memory card | Micro SD | vs | Micro SDHC, Micro SD | Both have memory card slots | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Internal storage | 16 GB | vs | 16 GB | More internal storage than most for storing music, photos and movies | ||||||
Keyboard & keypad
|
|
||||||||||
|
Numeric keypad | None | vs | None | Neither has a numeric keypad | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Keyboard | None | vs | None | Neither has a physical keyboard | ||||||
Network
|
|
||||||||||
|
Network | HSDPA (7.2 mbps) | vs | HSDPA (21 mbps) | Average data speeds | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Generation | 3.5G | vs | 3.5G | Standard network technology | ||||||
|
Download speed | Unknown | vs | 4.61 mbps | |||||||
|
Upload speed | Unknown | vs | 1.19 mbps | |||||||
|
Network latency | Unknown | vs | 134 ms | |||||||
|
Wifi | 802.11n (150 mbps) | vs | 802.11n (150 mbps) | Average wifi speed | ||||||
|
Wifi hotspot | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have wifi hotspots for wireless tethering | ||||||
|
NFC | Yes | vs | Yes | Both support NFC for wireless transactions | ||||||
|
Bluetooth | 3.0 | vs | 3.0 | Average bluetooth support | ||||||
Web browsing
|
|
||||||||||
|
Browser benchmark | Unknown | vs | 510 ms | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adobe Flash support | Yes | vs | Yes | Both support Adobe Flash | ||||||
Showing 0 comments