Nokia
700
vs. Samsung
Galaxy Ace

Nokia 700

5.4

Winner Symbian OS

Nokia 700

Reasons to buy the Nokia 700

Adobe Flash support
Adobe Flash support
Many games and videos on the Internet require Adobe Flash
NFC
NFC Support
Enables payment by phone and other wireless communications
Video out
Video output
Display pictures and video on TVs or other devices
Size
Really small
50x110x9 mm
Frequency
Average speed processor
1.3 GHz
Movie format
HD movies
720p @ 30fps
Bluetooth
Better bluetooth support
3.0
Screen PPI
sharp screen
228 PPI
Weight
Light-weight
96 g
Thickness
Thin
10 mm
Screen resolution
Low resolution screen
640x360
Internal storage
Very little internal storage
2 GB
Samsung Galaxy Ace

5.1

Runner-up Android

Samsung Galaxy Ace

"The image quality is good, considering the small size of the lens. The camera manages to capture colours nicely."
techtree.com | talking about the Galaxy Ace's camcorder
"Overall, the striking similarity with Apple's iPhone is what could make this phone attractive from a design standpoint."
phonearena.com | talking about the Galaxy Ace's form-factor

Reasons to buy the Samsung Galaxy Ace

App store
Average number of apps available
Android App Market
Wifi hotspot
Wifi hotspot
Share your phone's Internet connection with wifi devices
Talk time
Long talk time
11.2 hours
Battery capacity
Small battery capacity
1,350 mAh
Screen size
Small screen
3.5"
Standby time
Long standby time
26.7 days

Compare Again

vs Compare
Nokia 701 Nokia 700 700 vs 701
Nokia Lumia 710 Nokia 700 700 vs Lumia 710
Samsung Galaxy Ace 2 Samsung Galaxy Ace Galaxy Ace vs Galaxy Ace 2
Samsung Galaxy Y Samsung Galaxy Ace Galaxy Ace vs Galaxy Y

Overview

Processing power 6.7 vs 4.1
Nokia 700 Winner: Nokia 700
[details]
  • More powerful processor, snappier and more responsive (more than 60% faster), 1.3 GHz vs 0.8 GHz
Battery 4.0 vs 5.2
Samsung Galaxy Ace Winner: Samsung Galaxy Ace
[details]
  • Around 60% more talk time per battery charge, 11.2 hours vs 7.2 hours
  • Around 30% higher capacity battery, 1,350 mAh vs 1,080 mAh
  • Around 40% more standby time, less frequent charging, 26.7 days vs 19.4 days
Size 7.9 vs 7.5
Nokia 700 Winner: Nokia 700
[details]
  • More than 30% smaller, 50x110x9 mm vs 59x112x11 mm
  • Around 20% lighter, 96 g vs 113 g
  • Around 20% thinner, 10 mm vs 12 mm
Photo & Video 7.5 vs 7.2
Nokia 700 Winner: Nokia 700
[details]
  • The 700 has a Micro USB video output connector to display pictures or video on TVs or other devices, Micro USB vs None
  • Shoots high resolution HD (720p) video at a higher frame rate, 720p @ 30fps vs 320 x 240 @ 20fps
Sensors 7.8 vs 7.8
Too close to call
[details]
Music 7.0 vs 7.0
Too close to call
[details]
  • Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations
Screen 5.3 vs 5.1
Too close to call
[details]
  • Low resolution screens
  • Very small screens
Storage 1.5 vs 1.5
Too close to call
[details]
  • Less internal storage than average for storing music, photos and movies
Keyboard & keypad 1.0 vs 1.0
Too close to call
[details]
Web browsing - vs 3.8
Missing information
[details]
Network - vs 6.0
Missing information
[details]
Overall 5.4 vs 5.1

AppearanceClick and drag to rotate

Nokia
700
Nokia 700
 
Samsung Galaxy Ace Samsung
Galaxy Ace

Processing power

Nokia
700
Nokia 700
Samsung Galaxy Ace Samsung
Galaxy Ace
Help
Frequency 1.3 GHz vs 0.8 GHz The 700's has an average speed processor, but the Galaxy Ace is slower than most
Help
Number of cores Single core vs Single core Both have less multitasking capability due to having only 1 core
Help
RAM 512 MB vs 278 MB Average amount of RAM for running apps

Battery

Nokia
700
Nokia 700
Samsung Galaxy Ace Samsung
Galaxy Ace
Help
Talk time 7.2 hours vs 11.2 hours The Galaxy Ace has good talk time, but the 700 is average
Help
Standby time 19.4 days vs 26.7 days The Galaxy Ace has good standby time, but the 700 is average
Help
Battery capacity 1,080 mAh vs 1,350 mAh Lower capacity batteries
Help
Technology Lithium Ion vs Lithium Ion

Size

Nokia
700
Nokia 700
Samsung Galaxy Ace Samsung
Galaxy Ace
Help
Weight 96 g vs 113 g Light weight, with the 700 being particularly light
Help
Thickness 10 mm vs 12 mm Average thickness
Help
Size 50x110x9 mm vs 59x112x11 mm Both the 700 and Galaxy Ace are quite small
Help
Waterproof No vs No Neither are waterproof

Photo & Video

Nokia
700
Nokia 700
Samsung Galaxy Ace Samsung
Galaxy Ace
Help
Camera 5 MP vs 5 MP They both have cameras
Help
Flash Yes vs Yes Both have camera flashes
Help
Secondary Camera None vs None
Help
Movie format 720p @ 30fps vs 320 x 240 @ 20fps The 700 takes better movies than the Galaxy Ace
Help
Video out Micro USB vs None The 700 has a Micro USB video output connector to display pictures or video on TVs or other devices

Sensors

Nokia
700
Nokia 700
Samsung Galaxy Ace Samsung
Galaxy Ace
Help
GPS Assisted GPS vs Assisted GPS Have assisted GPS
Help
Accelerometer Yes vs Yes Both include an accelerometer
Help
Compass Yes vs Yes Both have integrated compasses
Help
Gyroscope No vs No

Music

Nokia
700
Nokia 700
Samsung Galaxy Ace Samsung
Galaxy Ace
Help
FM Radio Yes vs Yes Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations
Help
FM Transmitter No vs No Neither have built-in FM transmitters
Help
Headphone jack 3.5 mm vs 3.5 mm Both have a headphone jack

Screen

Nokia
700
Nokia 700
Samsung Galaxy Ace Samsung
Galaxy Ace
Help
Screen size 3.2" vs 3.5" Very small screens
Help
Screen resolution 640x360 vs 480x320 Low resolution screens
Help
Screen PPI 228 PPI vs 164 PPI The 700's screen is somewhat sharp, but the Galaxy Ace's is poor likely resulting in pixelation
Help
Screen type AMOLED vs TFT LCD Both have OLED screens, fairly common
Help
Touchscreen type Capacitive vs Capacitive Touchscreen

Storage

Nokia
700
Nokia 700
Samsung Galaxy Ace Samsung
Galaxy Ace
Help
Memory card Micro SDHC, Micro SD vs Micro SD, Micro SDHC Both have memory card slots
Help
Internal storage 2 GB vs 158 MB Less internal storage than average for storing music, photos and movies

Keyboard & keypad

Nokia
700
Nokia 700
Samsung Galaxy Ace Samsung
Galaxy Ace
Help
Numeric keypad None vs None Neither has a numeric keypad
Help
Keyboard None vs None Neither has a physical keyboard

Web browsing

Nokia
700
Nokia 700
Samsung Galaxy Ace Samsung
Galaxy Ace
Help
Browser benchmark Unknown vs 2,231 ms
Help
Adobe Flash support Yes vs No The 700 can access games and videos on the Internet that require Adobe Flash

Network

Nokia
700
Nokia 700
Samsung Galaxy Ace Samsung
Galaxy Ace
Help
Network HSDPA (7.2 mbps) vs HSDPA (7.2 mbps) Average data speeds
Help
Generation 3.5G vs 3.5G Standard network technology
Help
Download speed Unknown vs 2.41 mbps
Help
Upload speed Unknown vs 0.46 mbps
Help
Network latency Unknown vs 179 ms
Help
Wifi 802.11n (150 mbps) vs 802.11n (150 mbps) Average wifi speed
Help
Wifi hotspot No vs Yes The Galaxy Ace has a wifi hotspot to share it's Internet connection with other wifi devices
Help
NFC Yes vs No The 700 supports near field communication (NFC) which can be used for wireless payments and other transactions
Help
Bluetooth 3.0 vs 2.1 The 700 has average bluetooth support, but the Galaxy Ace's bluetooth support is somewhat older

Related Comparisons

Nokia 701 Nokia 700 700 vs 701
Nokia Lumia 710 Nokia 700 700 vs Lumia 710
Nokia Lumia 800 Nokia 700 700 vs Lumia 800
Nokia 603 Nokia 700 700 vs 603
Samsung Galaxy Ace 2 Samsung Galaxy Ace Galaxy Ace vs Galaxy Ace 2
Samsung Galaxy Y Samsung Galaxy Ace Galaxy Ace vs Galaxy Y
Samsung Galaxy mini 2 Samsung Galaxy Ace Galaxy Ace vs Galaxy mini 2
HTC Desire C with Beats Audio Samsung Galaxy Ace Galaxy Ace vs Desire C

Comments Which phone would you recommend, and why?

Showing 0 comments