|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compare Again
Overview
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Web browsing
|
|
||||||||||
 |
Browser benchmark | 1,226 ms | vs | 2,241 ms | The Explorer has an average speed web browser, but the Galaxy Ace's is fairly slow | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adobe Flash support | Yes | vs | No | The Explorer can access games and videos on the Internet that require Adobe Flash | ||||||
Photo & Video
|
|
||||||||||
|
Camera | 3 MP | vs | 5 MP | They both have cameras | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Flash | No | vs | Yes | The Galaxy Ace has a camera flash which helps avoid blurry photos when there isn't enough light | ||||||
|
Secondary Camera | None | vs | None | |||||||
|
Movie format | 480p @ 23fps | vs | 320 x 240 @ 20fps | Poor movies | ||||||
|
Video out | None | vs | None | Neither have video output to connect to TVs etc | ||||||
Battery
|
|
||||||||||
|
Talk time | 7.6 hours | vs | 11.2 hours | The Galaxy Ace has good talk time, but the Explorer is average | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Standby time | 19.1 days | vs | 26.7 days | The Galaxy Ace has good standby time, but the Explorer is average | ||||||
|
Battery capacity | 1,230 mAh | vs | 1,350 mAh | Lower capacity batteries | ||||||
|
Technology | Lithium Ion | vs | Lithium Ion | |||||||
Processing power
|
|
||||||||||
|
Frequency | 600 MHz | vs | 0.8 GHz | Less powerful processors than average, less snapiness and responsiveness | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of cores | Single core | vs | Single core | Both have less multitasking capability due to having only 1 core | ||||||
|
RAM | 512 MB | vs | 278 MB | Average amount of RAM for running apps | ||||||
Sensors
|
|
||||||||||
|
GPS | Assisted GPS | vs | Assisted GPS | Have assisted GPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Accelerometer | Yes | vs | Yes | Both include an accelerometer | ||||||
|
Compass | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have integrated compasses | ||||||
|
Gyroscope | No | vs | No | |||||||
Size
|
|
||||||||||
|
Weight | 108 g | vs | 113 g | Light weight | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thickness | 13 mm | vs | 12 mm | Average thickness | ||||||
|
Size | 57x102x12 mm | vs | 59x112x11 mm | Fairly small | ||||||
|
Waterproof | No | vs | No | Neither are waterproof | ||||||
Music
|
|
||||||||||
|
FM Radio | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FM Transmitter | No | vs | No | Neither have built-in FM transmitters | ||||||
|
Headphone jack | 3.5 mm | vs | 3.5 mm | Both have a headphone jack | ||||||
Network
|
|
||||||||||
|
Network | HSDPA (7.2 mbps) | vs | HSDPA (7.2 mbps) | Average data speeds | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Generation | 3.5G | vs | 3.5G | Standard network technology | ||||||
|
Download speed | 1.68 mbps | vs | 2.47 mbps | Somewhat slow actual download speeds | ||||||
|
Upload speed | 0.3 mbps | vs | 0.51 mbps | Somewhat slow actual upload speeds | ||||||
|
Network latency | 265 ms | vs | 176 ms | The Galaxy Ace has average network latency, but the Explorer's is worse than most | ||||||
|
Wifi | 802.11n (150 mbps) | vs | 802.11n (150 mbps) | Average wifi speed | ||||||
|
Wifi hotspot | Yes | vs | Yes | Both have wifi hotspots for wireless tethering | ||||||
|
NFC | No | vs | No | Neither support NFC for wireless transactions | ||||||
|
Bluetooth | 3.0 | vs | 2.1 | The Explorer has average bluetooth support, but the Galaxy Ace's bluetooth support is somewhat older | ||||||
Screen
|
|
||||||||||
|
Screen size | 3.2" | vs | 3.5" | Very small screens | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Screen resolution | 480x320 | vs | 480x320 | Low resolution screens | ||||||
|
Screen PPI | 179 PPI | vs | 164 PPI | Lower quality display of text, images and video | ||||||
|
Screen type | TFT LCD | vs | TFT LCD | Both have LCD screens, fairly common | ||||||
|
Touchscreen type | Capacitive | vs | Capacitive | Touchscreen | ||||||
Storage
|
|
||||||||||
|
Memory card | Micro SD, Micro SDHC | vs | Micro SD, Micro SDHC | Both have memory card slots | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Internal storage | 90 MB | vs | 158 MB | Less internal storage than average for storing music, photos and movies | ||||||
Keyboard & keypad
|
|
||||||||||
|
Numeric keypad | None | vs | None | Neither has a numeric keypad | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Keyboard | None | vs | None | Neither has a physical keyboard | ||||||
Related Comparisons
|
|
Showing 0 comments