Nokia E52

Winner
Nokia E52

6.4

vs

BLU Tango

5.3

BLU Tango

Runner-up
 
 

Reasons to buy the Nokia E52

Weight
Light-weight
98 g
Size
Really small
49x116x9 mm
Numeric keypad
Has a numeric keypad
Physical numeric keypad
Standby time
Long standby time
28 days
 

Reasons to buy the BLU Tango

App store
Many apps available
Android App Market
GPS
Assisted GPS
Assisted GPS
Adobe Flash support
Adobe Flash support
Many games and videos on the Internet require Adobe Flash
Touchscreen
Has a touch screen
Interact using your fingers
 

Compare Again

vs Compare
Nokia 701 BLU Tango Tango vs 701
BlackBerry Q10 BLU Tango Tango vs Q10
Nokia E72 Nokia E52 E52 vs E72
Nokia E6 Nokia E52 E52 vs E6

Overview

Keyboard & keypad 1.0 vs 5.5
Nokia E52 Winner: Nokia E52
[details]
  • Numeric keypads make dialing phone numbers fast and easy, Physical numeric keypad vs None
Sensors 7.8 vs 6.6
BLU Tango Winner: BLU Tango
[details]
  • Assisted GPS can pinpoint your location much faster, Assisted GPS vs GPS
Music 7.0 vs 7.0
Too close to call
[details]
  • Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations
Processing power - vs -
Missing information
[details]
  • Both have less multitasking capability due to having only 1 core
  • Less powerful processors than average, less snapiness and responsiveness
Web browsing - vs -
Missing information
[details]
Network - vs -
Missing information
[details]
  • Not the latest bluetooth support
  • Neither support NFC for wireless transactions
  • Neither have wifi hotspots for wireless tethering
Storage - vs 1.5
Missing information
[details]
Screen - vs 2.6
Missing information
[details]
Battery - vs 5.1
Missing information
[details]
Photo & Video - vs 7.2
Missing information
[details]
  • Neither have video output to connect to TVs etc
Size - vs 7.8
Missing information
[details]
  • Both the E52 and Tango are quite small
Overall 5.3 vs 6.4

Keyboard & keypad

BLU
Tango
BLU Tango
Nokia E52 Nokia
E52
Help
Numeric keypad None vs Physical numeric keypad The E52 has a numeric keypad, the Tango doesn't
Help
Keyboard None vs None Neither has a physical keyboard

Sensors

BLU
Tango
BLU Tango
Nokia E52 Nokia
E52
Help
GPS Assisted GPS vs GPS The Tango has an assisted GPS, but the E52's GPS is not assisted
Help
Accelerometer Yes vs Yes Both include an accelerometer
Help
Compass Yes vs Yes Both have integrated compasses
Help
Gyroscope No vs No

Music

BLU
Tango
BLU Tango
Nokia E52 Nokia
E52
Help
FM Radio Yes vs Yes Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations
Help
FM Transmitter No vs No Neither have built-in FM transmitters
Help
Headphone jack 3.5 mm vs 3.5 mm Both have a headphone jack

Processing power

BLU
Tango
BLU Tango
Nokia E52 Nokia
E52
Help
Frequency 600 MHz vs 600 MHz Less powerful processors than average, less snapiness and responsiveness
Help
Number of cores Single core vs Single core Both have less multitasking capability due to having only 1 core
Help
RAM Unknown vs Unknown

Web browsing

BLU
Tango
BLU Tango
Nokia E52 Nokia
E52
Help
Browser benchmark Unknown vs Unknown
Help
Adobe Flash support Yes vs No The Tango can access games and videos on the Internet that require Adobe Flash

Network

BLU
Tango
BLU Tango
Nokia E52 Nokia
E52
Help
Network UMTS (0.384 mbps) vs HSDPA (7.2 mbps) The E52's has average data speed, but the Tango is slower than most
Help
Generation 3G vs 3.5G The E52 has standard network technology, but the Tango's is older than most
Help
Download speed Unknown vs Unknown
Help
Upload speed Unknown vs Unknown
Help
Network latency Unknown vs Unknown
Help
Wifi 802.11b (11 mbps) vs 802.11g (54 mbps) Slower wifi than average
Help
Wifi hotspot No vs No Neither have wifi hotspots for wireless tethering
Help
NFC No vs No Neither support NFC for wireless transactions
Help
Bluetooth 2.1 vs 2.0 Not the latest bluetooth support

Storage

BLU
Tango
BLU Tango
Nokia E52 Nokia
E52
Help
Memory card Micro SD, Micro SDHC vs Micro SDHC, Micro SD Both have memory card slots
Help
Internal storage Unknown vs 60 MB

Screen

BLU
Tango
BLU Tango
Nokia E52 Nokia
E52
Help
Screen size Unknown vs 2.4"
Help
Screen resolution Unknown vs 320x240
Help
Screen PPI Unknown vs 166 PPI
Help
Screen type TFT LCD vs TFT LCD Both have LCD screens, fairly common
Help
Touchscreen type Resistive vs None

Battery

BLU
Tango
BLU Tango
Nokia E52 Nokia
E52
Help
Talk time Unknown vs 8 hours
Help
Standby time Unknown vs 28 days
Help
Battery capacity 1,000 mAh vs 1,500 mAh The E52 has average battery capacity, but the Tango's is really low
Help
Technology Lithium Ion vs Lithium Polymer

Photo & Video

BLU
Tango
BLU Tango
Nokia E52 Nokia
E52
Help
Camera 3.2 MP vs 3.2 MP They both have cameras
Help
Flash Yes vs Yes Both have camera flashes
Help
Secondary Camera None vs 0.1 MP
Help
Movie format Unknown vs 480p @ 15fps
Help
Video out None vs None Neither have video output to connect to TVs etc

Size

BLU
Tango
BLU Tango
Nokia E52 Nokia
E52
Help
Weight Unknown vs 98 g
Help
Thickness 13 mm vs 10 mm Average thickness
Help
Size 55x98x12 mm vs 49x116x9 mm Both the E52 and Tango are quite small
Help
Waterproof No vs No Neither are waterproof
Nokia 701 BLU Tango Tango vs 701
BlackBerry Q10 BLU Tango Tango vs Q10
BLU Tango Nokia 5800 XpressMusic Tango vs 5800 XpressMusic
BLU Tango Nokia N95 Tango vs N95
Nokia E72 Nokia E52 E52 vs E72
Nokia E6 Nokia E52 E52 vs E6
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 9105 Nokia E52 E52 vs BlackBerry Pearl 9105
Samsung Galaxy Ace Nokia E52 E52 vs Galaxy Ace

Comments Which phone would you recommend, and why?

Showing 0 comments